Waging a war we can all be proud of
By Murray Bourne, 03 Aug 2006
A piece by Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times (which I read in the Taiwan News, 11 Jan 2006) struck a chord with me and I have thought about it a lot since. Entitled "Waging a war we can all be proud of", it suggested that Bush and the US would be much better off if they launched a war against poverty, rather than the current nonsense that is supposed to reduce terrorism, but is actually increasing it.
Mr. Bush would do wonders for his legacy - and, above all, wonders for the poor - if he'd summon the moral vision to launch a high-profile Global War on Poverty. That is one American-backed war that nearly all the world would thunderously applaud.
Hear, hear.
And when you consider the costs involved in the Iraq war, it seems to me that spending only a fraction of that money on development in poor countries would be a very good insurance policy. Look how Indonesia had a much better view of the US after the tsunami, when the US was quick to provide assistance.
Here is one site's estimate of the $ cost so far:
And here are some more detailed costs from Institute of Policy Studies (link no longer available).
I can't verify the accuracy of these figures - suffice to say the US is spending a lot.
Footnote 1: I read tonight that the US military is spending $20 million on recovering the bodies of airmen who were shot down over Laos during the Vietnam era, 30 years ago.
Footnote 2: The coalition forces wasted $17 billion of Iraqi money, which they were supposed to distribute for the rebuilding of Iraq. Much of the money disappeared and cannot be accounted for. Scandalous.
Be the first to comment below.
